SRPs In A Prophy Appointment

 
 

Something that has come up in my own experience is when a dentist will subtly ask me to do an SRP during a prophy appointment.

For example, after conducting my periodontal assessment and discovering that a patient has a few areas of pocketing with bleeding, the dentist might come in for an exam and, instead of recommending SRP, recommend a “really good cleaning” today and a re-evaluation in six months.

But both the dentist and I know that without properly addressing those subgingival areas, what we find in six months may very well be unchanged.

He is asking me, without actually asking me, to SRP those few areas discovered today while also completing the prophy on the rest of the patient’s dentition.

To be honest, in the beginning of my career, I often did SRPs—or “borderline” SRPs—as prophys because I wasn’t always confident enough in my clinical judgment.

Sometimes it was easier just to say nothing.

Later, I would speak with older, more experienced hygienists who described similar experiences. Some said they often “gave the house away” earlier in their careers because they lacked the confidence to speak up.

But over time, and with more experience, things began to change—for them and for me.

Let me be clear: every hygienist has to decide how they want to approach situations like these. There are nuances to every patient and every clinical situation. I still work through this daily in my own practice. 

But for today’s conversation, I want to slow this particular scenario down and explore what we're actually asking of a hygienist when we expect SRP—whether localized or generalized—to happen during a prophy appointment.

Because SRP isn't simply more cleaning.

It requires more time, energy, and a different level of technical skill than a routine prophy.

Navigating subgingival root morphology to thoroughly remove biofilm and calculus is much different than removing deposits from the coronal surfaces of the teeth, where visibility and access are generally greater.

Once we cross into subgingival instrumentation and begin treating the root surfaces of teeth, the clinical demands change.

Depending on the patient and the areas being treated, local anesthetic may also be necessary for patient comfort. Administering anesthetic takes additional time, and for hygienists who don't give it frequently, having adequate time matters—not only for their own confidence and comfort, but ultimately for the patient's experience as well.

SRP may also require different instruments than what is available in a standard prophy setup.

Trying to thoroughly instrument a periodontal site during a prophy appointment without adequate time, anesthesia when needed, or the appropriate instruments is setting the hygienist up for an unnecessarily difficult situation.

And this is where the consequences begin to stack up.

A hygienist may feel rushed and frustrated.

Instrumentation may be less thorough than it could have been with appropriate time and resources.

Calculus may be burnished rather than adequately removed, potentially making subsequent removal more difficult.

The patient may leave without understanding that periodontal treatment was performed—or why those areas required something different from their routine cleaning.

And the hygienist has provided treatment beyond the original appointment without the time or resources normally allocated for it.

Do you see how quickly this can begin working against the best interests of the patient, the hygienist, and the practice?

There is another piece of this that I think deserves consideration, too.

When we quietly turn SRP into a “really good cleaning,” what are we communicating to the patient about the difference between preventive and periodontal care?

If today's treatment looks and feels like the same cleaning they've always received, why would they understand the significance of periodontal disease—or the treatment it may require in the future?

That distinction matters.

Again, every hygienist has to make these calls based on the individual patient, the clinical findings, and the circumstances in front of them.

But I hope situations like this invite more clinical reasoning and more discussion—with both the dentist and the patient—before we simply comply with an unspoken request because we feel pressured or assume we should.

Sometimes growing in confidence as a hygienist isn't about learning how to do more in the time we're given.

Sometimes it's about recognizing when the care we're being asked to provide deserves more time, more intention, and a conversation.

I hope this post finds you well and leaves you thinking about your own experiences—and about how you want to show up as the best hygienist you can be for yourself and your patients.


 
 
 
Previous
Previous

Perio: The Most Common Lawsuit in Dentistry?

Next
Next

The Fall of the Teeth Cleaner